The Data Model & Codecs
What is the Data Model?
The Data Model is how we reason about data moving through the various states. We can know how the data is structured through memory, programmatic access and manipulation, and serialization to and from bytes for storage or transfers.
Like the JSON data model, the IPLD Data Model includes data Kinds which include Booleans, Strings, Ints, Floats, Null, Lists and Maps, but also adds Bytes and Links (CIDs).
The data model defines a common representation of basic types that are easily representable by common programming languages and found in the most common and successful serialization formats.
const data = {
string: "☺️ we can do strings!",
ints: 1337,
floats: 13.37,
booleans: true,
lists: [1, 2, 3],
bytes: new Uint8Array([0x01, 0x03, 0x03, 0x07]),
links: CID(bafyreidykglsfhoixmivffc5uwhcgshx4j465xwqntbmu43nb2dzqwfvae)
}
Read more about the Data Model at ipld.io/docs/data-model
What are Kinds?
We refer to the different kinds of representable data in the Data Model as “kinds”: Booleans, Strings, Ints, Floats, Null, Bytes, Lists, Maps and Links. The ‘recursive kinds’ are Maps and Lists (since they can contain other kinds). We use the term “kinds” here to disambiguate this from “types”, which is a term we use at the Schemas level.
Read more about IPLD Kinds and specifics of what we expect regarding their bounds and representation at ipld.io/docs/data-model/kinds
What are Codecs?
Codecs are how IPLD moves data between the raw byte representation and their equivalent Data Model form. IPLD is ambitious in its aims to be able to represent many, varied types of content addressed data (not just file data for IPFS). To do this, it must be able to encode and decode those data formats. Empowering it to be able to represent, manipulate and navigate data in memory; codecs make it possible to turn at-rest binary data into meaningful data structures.
IPLD-native Codecs
Codecs for both JSON (multicodec code 0x0200
) and CBOR (multicodec code 0x51
) data are bundled with IPFS and may be used within most IPLD systems. However, both of these formats lack the key Link kind, so they cannot form coherent, linked DAGs and can therefore only be terminal blocks within IPLD graphs.
The raw codec (multicodec code 0x55
) is essentially a pass-through, from stored bytes, to Data Model Bytes. It also can only be a terminal within an IPLD graph but is used within IPFS file graphs to represent raw file data—usually as chunks of a complete file, connected by a parent DAG-PB block.
The DAG-PB codec is the original IPFS file data codec. It uses a fixed Protobuf format to represent just enough data to describe connected graphs of named links pointing to file data. DAG-PB is limited in that it can only represent Data Model Bytes and named Links. It is difficult to use DAG-PB for data other than standard file data.
DAG-CBOR is the most flexible (and arguably) useful native format of IPLD and IPFS. Built on CBOR, it enables the representation of all Data Model kinds, only needing to add Links to what CBOR can currently support (this is done via CBORs tag system). DAG-CBOR is the native format of the Filecoin chain, and is recommended for users building applications on IPLD (and IPFS) that are not focused on files.
DAG-JSON is similar to DAG-CBOR in that it can represent the entire IPLD Data Model. It uses special forms within the data to denote Links (including the encoding of CIDs as their string form) and Bytes (including the encoding of raw bytes as base64). DAG-JSON is less space efficient but can be human-readable. For this reason it is the default output format of the ipfs dag get
command which can be used to inspect IPLD blocks and nodes.
Examples
Given some arbitrary data, as shown above, that is compatible with the IPLD Data Model, what does it look like in encoded form?
DAG-JSON:
{
"arrays": [1, 2, 3],
"booleans": true,
"bytes": { "/": { "bytes": "AQMDBw" } },
"floats": 13.37,
"ints": 1337,
"links": { "/": "bafyreidykglsfhoixmivffc5uwhcgshx4j465xwqntbmu43nb2dzqwfvae" },
"string": "☺️ we can do strings!"
}
Note that DAG-JSON strips extraneous whitespace, the above example is pretty-printed for ease of reading.
DAG-CBOR:
DAG-CBOR is difficult to illustrate as it’s a purely binary format. Our example data encodes to the following binary data represented in hexadecimal:
a764696e74731905396562797465734401030307656c696e6b73d82a58250001711220785197229dc8bb115294
5da58e2348f7e279eeded06cc2ca736d0e879858b501666172726179738301020366666c6f617473fb402abd70
a3d70a3d66737472696e67781ae298baefb88f202077652063616e20646f20737472696e67732168626f6f6c65
616e73f5
But you can use cbor.me via the web, or install github.com/rvagg/cborg on the command line to replace this output with a human-readable one if you have raw CBOR to inspect.
Codecs for Non-IPFS Systems
Every content addressed data system (CAS) defines at least one data storage format. Some formats are common between systems like JSON or CBOR. CBOR is a binary format that is similar to JSON but more compact and able to represent more data types.
Popular content addressed systems (CAS) such as Git, Bitcoin and Ethereum have their own unique and custom formats, specifically engineered to their own use-cases.
IPLD has had codecs written for many different content addressed systems:
- Git (multicodec code
0x78
) - Bittorrent (multicodec code
0x7b
and0x7c
) - Bitcoin (multicodec codes
0xb0
,0xb1
,0xb2
) - Ethereum (multicodec codes
0x90
to0x9a
) - … and more
Caveat: as these are not core to IPFS or IPLD, most of these codecs are usually not as actively maintained as the IPLD-native codecs and may need some love!
Knowing these codecs and how data is formatted underneath, would enable IPLD developers to traverse their respective content addressed systems (CAS). Codecs, along with the Data Model, allows developers to make sense of the custom formats of other CASs.